I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
无人居住的空屋，墙上写着“人间烟火，生活如沸”。我刚走进，就被右侧树下突然窜出狂吠的大黑狗追着跑（图：南方人物周刊记者 刘璐明）
。业内人士推荐safew官方下载作为进阶阅读
Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, Mercury, Neptune and Uranus will all be visible at same time in curved line across sky
В Финляндии предупредили об опасном шаге ЕС против России09:28
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.